Curated Telehealth and Telemedicine Article http://ctel.org/2019/02/telehealth-policy-change-is-still-coming/ Well, it’s probably worth a refresher (see below for a helpfully supplied from the National Law Review), since, as you might recall, the bill comprises some significant telehealth provisions which impact its future, particularly in the area of funding. The bill is basically the federal government’s way of demonstrating support for the ever-expanding industry of telehealth. The advantages so far realized are many, and they can only continue to expand out of here. In reality, since Senator Brian Schatz (D-HI) commented, the bill’s inclusion of telehealth provisions supplies”the most significant changes made to Medicare law [so ] to utilize telehealth.”
There are basically five important elements to take away from the
invoice. In the past, the only folks who qualified for telestroke reimbursement were
Medicare patients treated from qualifying originating sites. Now, geographical and
facility-type needs no longer apply when particular originating cites use
telestroke to offer care, permitting more”opportunities for destination
medicine and new patients” The reimbursement expansion also has dialysis
services offered to distant patients either in their houses or in separate renal dialysis centers. Furthermore, dialysis patients are now able to receive
at-home telehealth equipment free of cost to them as long as the supplier meets
specific requirements. Furthermore, Medicare Advantage (MA) programs will”provide telehealth services as part of the basic benefit package,” although what
those specific providers are remains to be viewed. Lastly, and probably most exciting
to your patient, accountable care associations (ACOs) will permit a patient’s
house to become a qualified originating web site for telehealth services.
All these takeaways, as we already reported, are great news for telehealth patients and providers alike. They create better, more cost-efficient methods of care delivery, all the while giving patients more access to the care they need. However, as with all change, it attracts both crisp lines and grey places. Some of the new reimbursement opportunities, for instance, eliminate qualification for different repayments, so providers need to exercise diligence. Several elements of the bill also still need further clarification. Here is the ideal opportunity for providers and patients alike to become a part of their dialogue and be certain that outcomes desirable to both parties are attained during the rulemaking process and beyond. Due to telehealth’s continuing and speedy evolution, providers, patients, along with legislators in the conversation now play an immense role in what teleheath could and will look like in the future.